W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Browsers and .onion names

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:08:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CALcoZiqg=JLv6kkZ1FEfQTQ75CdqE+12TZ5Fq0HSgrKhQmb2-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> I'm surprized that an RFC on standards track managed to redefine how
> non-interested implementations must behave :

Wow, +1. DNS is what it is, but there are ways around it. For example,
by defining a new URI scheme (or set thereof) which defers name
lookups to Tor instead of (or ahead of) DNS.

It's more work up front, but seems far more likely to be successful.
Received on Thursday, 26 November 2015 17:08:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC