W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Streams after receiving GOAWAY

From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 18:32:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAF6rxgm1YpwPGyxx=1xqUG=zmDaaG9JP2vZn5ukeH4dstnbMWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org>
Cc: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 15 November 2015 at 15:20, Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org> wrote:
>> MUST NOT   This phrase, or the phrase "SHALL NOT", mean that the
>> definition
> is an absolute prohibition of the specification.
> I'm well aware of what a normative MUST NOT means, I'm arguing that it's use
> in this case is to strong (or to general) - in no small part because
> violating
> it is undetectable by the peer.

Just because a behavior is undetectable to a peer doesn't it mean it
is, or ought to be, allowed.

Eitan Adler
Received on Monday, 16 November 2015 02:33:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC