- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:24:26 +1300
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 13/10/2015 1:33 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hi Amos, > > I've raised the first issue here as: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/103 > > What do you (and others) think about Ted's suggestion? > Works far better than what was there before. If we cant get away from the singular nature of "demand" this is at least a bit more flexible in use-case coverage. > The rest of it looks like editorial suggestions, so I'll leave them for Tim to take on board. Ok. Amos
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 07:26:05 UTC