- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 06:49:49 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <19B50A7C-DE2B-4565-B4C5-17615999D027@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >Before we get to that, though =E2=80=94 is there a compelling reason not >to use the Link header for this? The Link header could theoretically be used to point to non-blocked versions of the content, but I don't think that schenario is likely. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 31 August 2015 06:50:16 UTC