- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:06:00 +1300
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
On 12/03/2015 3:30 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hi Amos, > > The changelog is removed before the RFC is published, so I think we're OK there. > Understood. I was using it to compare what my reading of the text was vs what your intention was. They didnt sync. > WRT the text, I think we can fix that by adding an equivalent proviso to proxy-auth-info, e.g.,: > > """ > The Proxy-Authentication-Info response header field is equivalent to Authentication-Info, except that its semantics are defined by the authentication scheme indicated by the Proxy-Authorization header field of the corresponding request, and applies to proxy authentication. > """ Yes, thats way better than what I proposed. Amos
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 03:06:41 UTC