- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:30:20 +0100
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2015-02-18 09:34, Greg Wilkins wrote: > > On 18 February 2015 at 10:46, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net > <mailto:mnot@mnot.net>> wrote: > > As we discussed (but for the benefit of everyone else) -- we've > already talked about this extensively, and came to consensus that > making such a change would be more likely to cause problems, without > making a material improvement in the protocol. > > > For the record, my part of that consensus was based on thinking that we > were bound to make a breaking change at some stage before h2, at least > for the change of version number. Thus in my process naivety, I fully > expected that the table would be fixed and/or optimised before RFC status Same here. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 10:30:47 UTC