- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:55:36 +0100
- To: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2015-01-30 13:34, Hervé Ruellan wrote: > I think it's a good thing to have a common mechanism that could be > reused by several authentication schemes (at least DIGEST and SCRAM for > now). > > I find that the definition of the Authentication-Info header field is > fuzzier in this draft than it was in DIGEST. In DIGEST this header field > is intended to be used for "information regarding the successful > authentication of a client response". > I'd tweak the wording in the draft to put back this precision. I think > it would alleviate Martin's concerns. Or did I miss something? > > Regards, > > Hervé. No, you didn't miss anything. Sounds like a good point (to stick with what 2617 said unless we have good reason to change it). Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 30 January 2015 12:56:15 UTC