- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:59:02 -0800
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 28 January 2015 at 02:36, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > > That's why I think it's reasonable to consider that, as a first step, we > could have something which satisfies exactly what Martin needs (eg: repeat > in a header field what is supposed to be advertised in the TLS ALPN), and > to ensure that the name of this header doesn't make it difficult to later > add information about what is being tunnelled (eg: TLS vs VPN vs anything > else). I have no objection to other signals, certainly. The other signals are much harder to conceptualize. I'm not opposed to exposing more information if it can be justified and worked into a solution. If someone has a need, they should develop a solution around that need and propose it.
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 17:59:28 UTC