Re: New tunnel protocol

On 2015-01-21 18:18, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 20 January 2015 at 21:25, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>> In section 2.2 there are a "must not" and three "must" wordings. These
>> all need to be normative to make any sense.
>
> Done.  And thanks.
>
> On 20 January 2015 at 20:59, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> I notice that we don't have any open issues for this document. Pending Martin's formatting changes, I'd like to start thinking about WGLC for this document.
>
> Sounds like a plan.  Do you want to see a new revision?

I'd like to see a new revision :-)

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 21:01:30 UTC