Re: Editorial pull requests for h2

Thanks for doing that Willy, it's always good to have a sanity check.

On 21 January 2015 at 00:01, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> I visited several of them with any possible comment in front of them or
> "OK" if I have no objection :
>   #698 => OK
>   #697 => OK
>   #696 => maybe "if it cannot decompress a header block" would solve
>           the issue instead, as it covers various causes ?

I've proposed the following change instead:

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/699

>   #694 => OK
>   #692 => read 4 of them, seems OK
>   #690 (PRI safe & idempotent) => I don't know, I saw there was some debate
>         about this between Roy and Amos and I don't know if there was an
>         agreement (I missed it).

I didn't see any agreement either, but it's easier if we have the PR
ready in place.

>   #689 => OK
>   #688 => OK
>   #686 => OK
>   #685 => OK
>   #684 => OK for both
>   #683 => OK
>   #679 => OK
>   #670 => OK

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 17:27:37 UTC