- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:16:04 +0000
- To: Sawood Alam <ibnesayeed@gmail.com>
- cc: ietf-http-wg <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CALOnmf9LeKoKg1xErVYW-uF1WME+LUZZef_ueYoEKU+-7kvLVw@mail.gmail.com> , Sawood Alam writes: >> Nope, not only does HTTP/2.0 still use second granularity, it still >> lugs timestamps around in ASCII format. > >Thanks for the quick response. Is there any discussion publicly available >on this matter, why it was decided no to be changed? I guess the reason is >probably backward compatibility, but I would like to know more about it. Improvements were proposed but not adopted. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 11 May 2015 15:16:31 UTC