- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:02:42 +1100
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com>, HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On 2 Apr 2015, at 1:53 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > Mark, > > Do we also list h2c and h2c-14 etc. ? Of course. > Also, I couldn't help my OC self and sorted the table. You are forgiven :) > > cheers > > > > > On 2 April 2015 at 13:26, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Right. > > The most common values will be “h2” and “h2-14” (because 14 is the last implementation draft we nominated, and is what most implementations use today AFAICT). > > Cheers, > > > > On 2 Apr 2015, at 1:15 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 1 April 2015 at 18:58, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is draft 17 the final? I never found an actual finalized RFC. > > > > The RFC editor is working on -17. There will be no technical changes > > between that and the final document. > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > -- > Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> @ Webtide - an Intalio subsidiary > http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales > http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 05:03:11 UTC