- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:37:15 +0000
- To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
- cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <8DABF37B-88AB-4402-BF7F-4EBCAF2D73DE@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir writes: >Would you object less if the error code was named INAPPROPRIATE_SECURITY = >rather than INADEQUATE_SECURITY ? I would find UNDESIRABLE_SECURITY much more appropriate given that this is a value judgment about which reasonable experts in the field might disagree. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 08:37:41 UTC