Re: 9.2.2, Rough Consensus, and Working Code

On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 01:02:23 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>
> So, maybe the path forward would be to leave the cipher suite  
> requirements at MUST -- putting the responsibility for conforming on the  
> administrator in some deployments -- but reduce the requirement to  
> generate INADEQUATE_SECURITY to a SHOULD, thereby letting an  
> implementation that doesn't have the ability (or desire) to enforce off  
> the hook.
>
> Need to think through the implications of that, but WDYT?
>

I'll echo Mikes rebasing comment. In my other email I agree with you...

/Martin Nilsson

-- 
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:17:47 UTC