Latency is indeed a good way to get rid of side-channel attacks. Thanks for the input, Martin! On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 October 2014 15:30, Raullen Chai <raullenchai@google.com> wrote: > > Yes, this is the specified way. Is the latency introduced by transmitting > > the padding payload before transmitting the remaining data payload a > > concern? > > Actually, it's probably better. You don't risk opening a timing > side-channel by having the receiver complete processing prior to > receiving the entire block. >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 23:29:37 UTC