- From: Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:09:18 +1000
- To: Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Robert Collins wrote: > > It also raises questions in my mind about SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH > > Given > > Client1 > Client2 > Proxy > Server > > If client1 has SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH=1, and client2 has > SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH=0, the Proxy has SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH=1, then the > server may push resources for both clients, and the proxy will have to > cancel streams when they are for client2 ? > This is exactly this issue that I raised last week[1], although I was talking about the case when you are using a HTTP2 load balancer that also has HTTP 1 clients, although the same issue arrises when you have HTTP2 clients with push disabled. I raised an issue[2] but apparently it is too late to do anything about it. Stuart [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2014JulSep/2374.html [2] https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/621 > That is surely doable but seems a little wasteful. I wonder if we can > do better? > > -Rob > >
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 22:09:54 UTC