W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting it out the door. Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:07:46 +1300
Message-ID: <5428F732.4090204@treenet.co.nz>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 29/09/2014 11:09 a.m., Adrian Cole wrote:
> Agreed.
> 
> If we are talking trivial changes to implement like switching this 
> back or mucking with static table or huffman codes, I don't mind.
> They are easy to knock out vs rearranging frames, op-codes,
> lengths, etc.

Strange. I find quite the opposite.
 Re-arranging the order of a fixed sequence of struct members or
parser calls to fill them is far easier than implementing a whole
management mechanism to cope with static table ID changes every time a
header is parsed or scheduled to be written to a connection.

Amos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUKPcxAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjbI8H/ij9WkYGGNJG4ZjxhdCIOT9u
5PSKFL1HZ6/xebfNTnCKIaG84JkOPGMqIa6OLXi7aImNBZLM83748LFfyrREjnU1
koOxfeR/c9xThR8dew2+AgUmLFBeqp8F4b/syB/Elekt5RKqvRrYAhgPVfr4uSIO
XR9EWzAC765jOI2w+4yyoZO9VdjRer8GJha5KOeUL68LYV9mUKTcTLj7tDoiTQMH
AYvfW2VFqH1x5dzKNfT7EEw0qXoJk72RmmDmbB0rCmc8tvy/VAA+H0CLtenRAoF2
C35ImfbXCnvcdoVli2277SuBvAa/v8771nb9IYcoEICtN5iZMm1m/HtfMifBT10=
=fUMS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 06:08:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC