W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: #578: Header Table and Static Table Indices Switched

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 23:08:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNeDdkAUR-mYM2ogLvtxq42qSLTW5pC7s-2NvWbTrsZ4jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
It really needs to be changed back.
-=R

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27/09/2014 10:01 a.m., Matthew Kerwin wrote:
> > On 27/09/2014, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
> >> I'm still very much in favour of the switch.  It has resulted in
> >> good code simplications and enabled several optimisations.
> >>
> >> I understand Jeff's concern, but essentially one size doesn't fit
> >> all and I think Jeff's use-case is not the norm.   But even for
> >> Jeff's usecase, h2 headers should be far better than h1.
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
>
> +1.
>
> Amos
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUJkdaAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjR0cH/2tmIgP5a+TYZkgQ0fgCZH+3
> 439QVTQP0Iy07kxC/ZjZCE7j4iJyDbGfpLQg7BW2P3GikUpWhStKzh7AZAKA33zK
> rOUyRCI3gJWbmZMltlNzFdx4FQk7hVlyLck6J7NSyVgie31x42wvkxEW3+MFcB7g
> W5L3lO5JlPkmnrbBn23fgUXxjj67NMUaRSzEei7hyCoXZVncRTdmF1uU8e84V8MR
> LXuljOYEGhPUcGcPskQSssYHu2CMHUmFHnstDebEWV4g9yC2eD3pC07Tws0L0dpn
> 1JpxFcr02/fmN8DU5a3brQyYxDiutxBGb+pfI+A0kl+5pXj6tdFUbp1jZHIVgio=
> =T+s1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Received on Saturday, 27 September 2014 06:09:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC