W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:32:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVd+xU9EJUSwdEq9roBzwOp7qk5dn6yXvZNq1dVz08vTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 September 2014 08:21, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know there are ways to work around it, but it seems sub-optimal to need to
> maintain two separate connection pools for push enabled vs non-push enabled
> clients, especially when it seems to be easy to fix on a protocol level.

It's still strictly better than HTTP/1.1.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 07:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC