W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Huffman [was: Re: h2 header field names]

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:33:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVuxfV3HZrkXGE2GaSetYBt_KGxa_vJBd9wjCL9xG10rA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)" <robby.simpson@ge.com>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 5 September 2014 15:45, Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)
<robby.simpson@ge.com> wrote:
> Were all of these aspects documented anywhere or is this code the only
> documentation we have?  I agree with PHK - we are likely to see folks
> wishing to understand the process and I believe transparency and clear
> documentation are the best answer.

In general, participation in the process achieves that goal.  There is
no obligation on us to document the reasoning behind any and all
decisions, only to capture those decisions.  Where we do provide
explanations, there can be a range of reasons.  Transparency alone
isn't enough of a reason.
Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 23:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC