- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:02:26 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sep 3, 2014, at 4:37 PM, Roberto Peon wrote: > Well, it is no skin of my back if upgrade is less well supported than a TLS based negotiation. I think they are entirely different beasts, used in different contexts. > The difference extends beyond settings when one considers extensions. Hmm, I thought extensions are required to be negotiated with SETTINGS, but it seems 5.5 doesn't mandate a specific method for negotiating. That'll be fun. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 00:02:49 UTC