W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 use of Upgrade

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:22:02 -0700
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EB4B462F-97E3-4A98-9424-35D9936AEC94@gbiv.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
On Sep 3, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:

> Not in the ALPN-based connectivity case, at least, implying different codepaths (and a required increase in verbosity near the start of the communication) for upgrade vs ALPN-based negotiation.

That was already implied just by the use of Upgrade on an *existing*
connection.  The client is already telling the server what settings
it wants -- why does it need to repeat that in a painfully stupid
factorial combination of protocol name tokens?

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 23:22:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC