- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:20:54 +0000
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <D1F029E0-D5E5-4959-8F39-61310DF04C45@gbiv.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" w rites: >If I thought that anyone would use padding on a regular basis, then >I would make the pad-length part of a fixed frame header that everyone >has to send. My suggestion to use separate padding frames is partly >because I don't think it will be used at all, or at least only under >very specific circumstances that can justify the overhead. Not to mention that padding makes absolutely no sense for plaintext... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 20:21:17 UTC