W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 priority

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:32:13 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NFJQdDZr0Pz_0LJJ_of=AVcQcUBAuLr3MuAw9XYqmFn1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 3 September 2014 09:43, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

> I would really appreciate it if folks would stop hijacking my threads

Sorry my bad: anticipating failure again.

On the substance of this thread, I agree that an optional priority should
not be part of headers frame.  We've not yet implemented priorities but are
interested in experimenting with their use.   Happy for the detail to be
moved to appendix or other document.


Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 00:32:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC