- From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:49:51 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
It's the remnant of an evolution process that didn't get far enough. I'm going to change this if it's not too much trouble. Hervé. > -----Original Message----- > From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w@1wt.eu] > Sent: dimanche 31 août 2014 17:41 > To: Julian Reschke > Cc: HTTP Working Group > Subject: Re: HPACK WGLC feedback > > Hi Julian > > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 03:46:14PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > so I just read this (the current version checked into git) end-to-end, > > and don't have any substantial comments. I might if I actually tried to > > implement it, though. > > > > The one *editorial* comment I have is that having the two tables called > > "static table" and "header table" is very confusing. Is there a reason > > why it's not simply "static table" and "dynamic table"? > > I agree with you, and it's how I noted it on paper while thinking about > implementation, because I had the same concerns. > > Willy >
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 07:50:45 UTC