- From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 13:15:40 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:26:24 +0200, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > The values we have there are based on a frequency analysis provided by > Akamai. The methods and status codes that we have account for some > ridiculously large proportion of requests. And note that every entry > makes the header table larger, which increases the number of bytes > needed to reference the header table. > Just because it is frequent doesn't mean we should support it. I think that the :status 400, :status 404 and :status 500 should go away. We don't have to fail efficiently, and response headers are less interesting to optimize than request headers. /Martin Nilsson -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 11:16:07 UTC