W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Section 6.9 (WINDOW_UPDATE), shouldn't it always be a connection error if window increment is 0?

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:40:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUL9GT7prrVJezm8gqRqEHp8uLgQQX=JCLg9FvEEo2HvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Cox <macox@microsoft.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 5 August 2014 09:33, Matthew Cox <macox@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I don’t see any reason to allow a server to send a bogus frame in this way
> even if they set a stream id.

Of course a client would *never* send one ;)

> Unless someone has a good reason to allow this I purpose making this always
> a connection error regardless of the intended target of the window update.

As always, it is your prerogative to turn stream errors into
connection errors.  I generally encourage people to do so. I don't
think that the spec needs to take such an aggressive line here though.
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 16:41:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC