- From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:59:39 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
HTTP Upgrade Sent from my iPad > On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> On 2014-07-24 19:26, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> We already say “The asterisk-form of request-target is only used for a server-wide OPTIONS request”. <http://httpwg.github.io/specs/rfc7230.html#rfc.section.5.3.4> > > True, but not fully sufficient, as long as people disagree with what "server-wide" means... I've seen attempts to use "OPTIONS *" both when revising WebDAV and when introducing PATCH, and it took a lot of energy to prevent it. > > Do we have an example for use of "OPTIONS *" that actually makes sense? > > Best regards, Julian > > >
Received on Friday, 25 July 2014 05:00:12 UTC