W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:43:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWqNFhFG=dwXX4L2s7qCshO4sn=GVo3hsGvDwhRa11+WA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>, HTTPBIS working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 24 July 2014 08:33, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure that this is easy to parse.

Yeah, I've tried again.  Please let me know if you think I could make it better.

>    - This field MUST NOT be empty for http or https URIs;
>    - http or https URIs that do not contain a path component
>      MUST include a value of '/' or '*'
>
>    - If :method is not OPTIONS and http or https URI do
>      not contain a path, then :path is '/'
>    - If this is OPTIONS request in asterisk form, then
>      :path is '*'
>    - If :method is OPTIONS and http or https URI do
>      not contain a path, then :path is '*'
>
> I got that enumerated ?

Yep.  Makes me wish that my suggestion to eliminate the asterisk form
a few years back was accepted by the working group.
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 15:43:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC