W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: consensus on :query ?

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:20:02 +0000
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Jeroen de Borst <J.deBorst@F5.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37216.1405956002@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20140721150238.GC28569@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
>On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:52:17PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>> >That sounds like an interop nightmare=85 what do you do if there are =
>> >both? Lots of edge cases...
>> 
>> You always append '?' and :query and leave people with the result
>> the asked for...
>
>Not exactly, I'd say you append '?' only if :query is present (eventhough
>empty) then append :query.

Sorry for being unclear:  That was what I meant.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 15:20:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC