W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: consensus on :query ?

From: Jeroen de Borst <J.deBorst@F5.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:23:54 +0000
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CFF29A8A.13500%j.deborst@f5.com>
Does adding :query imply that seeing a ? in :path now requires error
handling?

Jeroen

On 7/21/14, 10:16 AM, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:

>In message <4DD79E4D-6340-4181-BB20-E981D280CCFB@mnot.net>, Mark
>Nottingham wri
>tes:
>
>>At this point I'm concerned enough about getting through our security
>>review that I'm inclined not to do this; the possible benefit (which
>>the WG seems open to, if not enthusiastic about) doesn't appear to be
>>worth the risk (both that to the actual security of people using the
>>protocol, and the risk of not making it through our security reviews).
>
>I would like to have some idea about the compression gain before
>we make up our mind.
>
>-- 
>Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
>incompetence.
>
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 14:24:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC