- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:33:01 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <9B85C3C7-4787-4355-8F6B-0754D100F353@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >My reading of the WG is that the best we're going to do for consensus >here is option (b) - keeping continuation, and adding an advisory >setting for the largest uncompressed header set that a recipient is >willing to accept. > >Does anyone have further information to addd? If not, will mark as >editor-ready. If we're having to live with the CONTINUATION DOS-vector, can we at least have the END-STREAM flag appear on the last CONTINUATION frame ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 20 July 2014 21:33:24 UTC