- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:06:07 -0400
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Hi Greg, Sorry for the delay; was in the air. On 19 Jul 2014, at 2:11 am, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > How do we transport large headers?: > a) Large Frames > b) Continuations > c) Fragmented Headers frame > > How do we limit the max header size? > x) Expressed as a max compressed size (perhaps == a max frame size) > y) Expressed as a max uncompressed size > z) No declared limit (but receivers may apply a limit with 431 or GO-AWAY) > > I think any of the limits can be applied to any of the transports. > > Mark - is it too late to re frame the consensus questions? Have you been able to see any clarity in the other thread? If you look at how I formulated the question, it was mostly about a/b (c still looks like it doesn’t have broad support), with a bit of wiggle room on x/y/z (and I do think we can answer a/b/c and then tackle x/y/z). More soon, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 20 July 2014 15:06:32 UTC