W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)

From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:07:52 -0400
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <20C95087-59CD-4149-A595-9B2C0D726F3A@apple.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
OK, so that allows the sender to set the header table size to 0, but not to clear it and leave the size alone...


On Jul 18, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:28:39PM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote:
>> Martin,
>> 
>> I know we have a setting for the max header table size, and the
>> recipient can clear the sender's header table by setting the max
>> header table size to 0, but I don't see a way for the sender to
>> clear the recipient's header table - that would be necessary to
>> reset things if the sender did not send the HEADERS frame to the
>> recipient and was unable to revert the header table to its previous
>> state.
> 
> See section 4.4 in -07.
> 
> "Maximum Header Table Size Change".
> 
> 
> -Ilari
> 

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair



Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 20:08:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC