W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:36:10 +0200
Message-ID: <53C8C05A.8030607@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-07-18 02:42, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Greg,
>
> You're talking about a separable issue here; Julian's proposal is to maintain our current approach to 100 (Continue), and that has had very broad support within the WG.
>
> Cheers,

Well, my proposal is for 1xx other than 100 or 101. I haven't thought 
about what's the best way to emulate expect/continue in HTTP/2.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 06:37:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC