- From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:10:29 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > 1) Your preferred outcome (if any) A: It is the cleanest solution, with the least complexity, and addresses all but a very limited use case. > 2) Whether you can live with the other option, and if not, why I can live with B > > "I have no preference" is useful information too. > > If you indicate you can't live with one (or both) of the options, you MUST give a detailed, relevant reason as to why; omitting the reason means your "can't live with" will be ignored. > > Thanks, > > P.S. Please state *your* preference, not what you think the WG can live with. > > P.P.S. This is not a call for more discussion; please resist replying to others' preferences. > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > -- Jason T. Greene WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 05:10:58 UTC