W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues

From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:10:29 -0500
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A988600E-BDFA-4E53-95D7-A6ED8FE17644@redhat.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>

On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> 
> 1) Your preferred outcome (if any)

A: It is the cleanest solution, with the least complexity, and addresses all but a very limited use case. 

> 2) Whether you can live with the other option, and if not, why

I can live with B

> 
> "I have no preference" is useful information too.
> 
> If you indicate you can't live with one (or both) of the options, you MUST give a detailed, relevant reason as to why; omitting the reason means your "can't live with" will be ignored.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> P.S. Please state *your* preference, not what you think the WG can live with.
> 
> P.P.S. This is not a call for more discussion; please resist replying to others' preferences.
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 05:10:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC