W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:12:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUQi+6ToxQbWAOF3bPfOZqH+h14OrSk7SY0g7ozS1kafw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 17 July 2014 16:59, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
> So at least it looks like all the voices here can live with 100 semantics.

That's taking liberties.  I think that Mark will make that sort of
assessment.  And I note that the number of participants is pretty low.

> I prefer keeping RFC723x semantic exactly.

So you've said.  But you keep talking about mechanisms rather than
semantics.  It seems to me like you want a near-perfect facsimile of
the mechanism too.
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 00:13:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC