- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:36:10 +0000
- To: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <0355A0F3-2FCC-4713-9851-1867529B76F8@apple.com>, Michael Sweet writes: >I'd just call the flag "EXPECT_WINDOW_UPDATE" and document that it >corresponds to the Expect: 100-continue semantics of HTTP/1.1. Works for me. >We'll still need to define the HTTP/1.1 gateway behavior, e.g., a 2.0 to >1.1 gateway needs to implement a timeout that sends a WINDOW_UPDATE >frame if it doesn't see a 100 response in a timely manner. The HTTP/1.1 spec already tells you that. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 13:36:34 UTC