- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:55:56 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <53C7C6C6.4030407@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >On 2014-07-17 14:44, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >The concrete proposal is to handle 1xx messages in HTTP/2 exactly the >same way as in HTTP/1.1. HTTP/2 will need code (and specification) to >deal with 1xx one way or another, and I believe my proposal has the >property of being both simple and consistent with 1.1. And as I said: I think that's a bad idea. We can do 100 better, don't need 101 and we have no idea how any future 1xx codes might or might not work anyway. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 12:56:19 UTC