W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:38:36 +0200
Message-ID: <53C7C3CC.8080105@gmx.de>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-07-17 14:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> ...
> So this is my position:
>
> I'm against supporting 1xx responses the way HTTP/1 does.
> ...

FWIW, I do support that we don't need 101, and that we might be able to 
do 100 better.

However, that doesn't cover other cases of 1xx. Yes, I realize that 
there currently do not seem any, but I'm very unhappy to close an 
existing extension point without very good reasons.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 12:39:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC