- From: 山本和彦 <kazu@iij.ad.jp>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:35:56 +0900 (JST)
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
>> I think that the index for static table and one for dynamic table can
>> be separated. If we take such a design, HPACK implementation would get
>> simpler.
>
> Could you elaborate your idea?
> I guess you have new index opcode for static table but it is not sufficient.
What I thinking is to use two tables separately.
<-- Header Table --> <-- Static Table -->
+---+-----------+---+ +---+-----------+---+
| 1 | ... | k | | 1 | ... | 61|
+---+-----------+---+ +---+-----------+---+
^ |
| V
Insertion Point Dropping Point
Each table has its own index. Prepare necessary operations and their
binary format.
--Kazu
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 07:36:22 UTC