Re: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads

On 11 Jul 2014, at 3:39 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

>  if the WG does decide that headers MUST be fragmentable and interleaveable, then the solution is to send them over a segment in DATA frames (or a HEADER frame that works exactly like DATA frames)

It sounds like you're advocating for Jeff's proposal:
  http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+pLO_ieYC8Sbvk7dNqd2+mtQOn2qxBkrUSxp+9VrTDrzQcFXQ@mail.gmail.com


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 06:10:51 UTC