- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:37:37 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 10/07/2014 4:13 p.m., Jeff Pinner wrote: >>> I'm happy with 64k as a max-representable framesize :) >>> 128k is almost OK-- I'd just steal a bit from the type field. >> >> >> So max frame size is a little bit of personal preference mixed in with some >> experience gained from SPDY (on todays networks with todays traffic). > > experience from SPDY that 24-bits is too large plus a preference for > byte boundaries = 64k > SPDY had end-to-end 24-bits by default. As I understand it some bad actors could and did force their large frames down unwilling participants connections and got away with it. The proposal is to have hop-by-hop agreement for anything other than 16KB. With bad actors receiving 431 responses, whether they be application layer actors or h2 implementations. Totaly different behaviour incentives, designed explicitly to encourage a healthy HTTP/2 environment. Amos
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 12:38:10 UTC