W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 06:25:43 +0000
To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <96054.1404973543@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CA+pLO_hKYi=YwNM_SkDMz5obDP4HFVS5V_a8qDAGRv7ssABX3Q@mail.gmail.com>, Jeff Pinner writ
es:
>>> I'm happy with 64k as a max-representable framesize :)
>>> 128k is almost OK-- I'd just steal a bit from the type field.
>>
>>
>> So max frame size is a little bit of personal preference mixed in with some
>> experience gained from SPDY (on todays networks with todays traffic).
>
>experience from SPDY that 24-bits is too large  [...]

too large for what and when ?

For max frame size, I don't think 16 or 17 bits is enough.

For max header size I think 64 KB is more than plenty.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 06:26:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC