W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Another CONTINUATION Proposal

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:50:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_gKg=gK+rdaHcJX3vUCW+bwa7pEkiNsNskQF9iOjVfMQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> My understanding is that the problem with PUSH_PROMISE modifying the stream state isn't just that it's changing the state of a stream, but also because it's changing the hpack state. In other words, moving the headers to a different frame type doesn't solve the issue that a frame carrying hpack header blocks changes shared state.

Correct, we'd have to remove the header block form PUSH_PROMISE so
that it only changed stream state. Push streams would now look like:


where the first set of HEADERS frames contained the request header
fields, the second set the response header fields, and the third
optional set the response triailers
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 21:51:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC