W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:10:04 +1000
Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A811A4A2-100D-44A2-8245-010D1CE5CC62@mnot.net>
To: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>

On 8 Jul 2014, at 12:06 pm, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:

> Mark,
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Or at least one issue that the fixed max frame size cannot be tuned for any reason
>> That's a design decision that was made a long time ago. To reconsider it, I need more than vague concerns that amount to "I don't like it"; I need concrete problems that it causes.
> For printing 16k frames/chunks cause a 2x performance drop.  And for video streaming you'll likely see similar issues (and stuttering) due to the volume of data involved. (see my other post on the subject)

Out of curiosity - are your use cases *actually* using HTTP/2, or are you assuming some mapping of IPP to HTTP/2?


Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 04:10:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC