W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:39:11 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NHYT5TKfj3n-xmGsz7erTN9cg+yOkYd0toqCYtv7A6SwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I've pushed some fixes to a few editorial issues in the proposal identified
by Martin

https://github.com/gregw/http2-spec/commit/b55765fc173823da1e515ec653604d9cea6ce820

cheers



On 8 July 2014 13:23, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

>
> On 8 July 2014 10:58, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> That's a design decision that was made a long time ago. To reconsider it,
>> I need more than vague concerns that amount to "I don't like it"; I need
>> concrete problems that it causes.
>
>
> insert Michael Sweets use-case here.
>
> cheers
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that
> scales
> http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
>



-- 
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 03:39:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC