W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014


From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 16:55:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWZKEYcM9BumEGm8dKc_Q4FfEpDXTApph4Ge4uZJbVjhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Cc: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 3 July 2014 16:49, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
> Do you mean "padding can't be used"? Otherwise I can still send an empty
> HEADERS, padded out to the full frame size, and put all my real bytes in a
> CONTINUATION. Because I'm a jerk.

I'll try to remember that.

You can only add 256 bytes of padding though.

The plan here was to count the padding toward the limit.  If you feel
the need to pad, then that would not be possible if you were too close
to the cap your peer sets.
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 23:56:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC