- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 22:33:18 +1000
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2 Jul 2014, at 9:30 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > But as jumbo frames have been ruled out as an option, we can live with 2). We can live with 0), 1) and 3), so long as it does not become a crime (of blackmail or otherwise) to not support CONTINUATIONs. I ruled out jumbos because there was poor support for them when we resolved that issue; if people have a change of heart based on this discussion, it’s worth knowing. I just want to keep this discussion as manageable as possible… Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 12:33:48 UTC