- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:45:11 +1000
- To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
OK, thanks.
I’ll try to find room in the schedule; Tuesday is getting crowded.
Regards,
On 2 Jul 2014, at 6:22 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 07:42, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> ...
>> 2) Maintenance
>>>
>>> - RFC 7238 ("The Hypertext Transfer Protocol Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)") from "experimental" to "proposed" (this wasn't a WG item)
>>
>> Do you want to give an update?
>>
>>
>>> - RFC 5987 ("Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters") from "proposed" to "standard" (this wasn't a WG item) - see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-rfc5987bis-latest.html>
>>
>> Ditto.
>
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-rfc5987bis-07.html> - the main issue is editorial; some parts need to be rewritten as the httpbis specs do not have a common concept of parameter syntax anymore (the same might be true for 2616, but that wasn't as clear).
>
>> ...
>>> 3) New stuff
>>>
>>> - "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Client-Initiated Content-Encoding" (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-cice-latest.html>)
>>
>> 15 minutes enough?
>
> Update: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-cice-01.html>
>
>> ...
>>> - Header field syntax is something people continue to struggle with; maybe define how to use JSON in header fields to make things easier for new header field definitions
>>
>> Draft?
>
> A sketch: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-jfv-00.html>
>
> > ...
>
> Best regards, Julian
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 08:45:40 UTC